Discussion about this post

User's avatar
John's avatar

"What won't matter, at all, is a policy that keeps an unvaccinated 35-year-old Serbian athlete from entering the United States."

The policy is not directed at 35-year-old Serbian athletes -- it's aimed at everyone entering the US. It may seem especially ridiculous when applied to Djokovic, but we can't tailor every rule to every edge case. Everyone has to deal with rules that seem ridiculous sometimes, but the idea that we ought to change the rules for or exempt rich/famous/powerful people is not a good argument. Maybe you think the travel requirement has outlived its value, but then Djokovic's ability to play in the US Open is not exactly your best argument, as it's not a particularly representative example. And, in fact, travel requirements for athletes DO have some value -- Aaron Judge and other baseball players seem to have gotten vaccinated primarily so they could play in Canada. Even if the public health impact is small, it's positive, and it's certainly greater than the public health impact of Djokovic catching Nadal.

Expand full comment
Tom Flynn's avatar

Great piece Ross, and kudos for banging this drum.

Expand full comment
30 more comments...

No posts