Discussion about this post

User's avatar
John J’onzz's avatar

Lots of thought-provoking material here, and a good piece overall, but I'd argue the problem isn't "left" comedy vs. "right" comedy. Comedy wants to be funny, not support one political party or another. Political comedy is fine, and necessary, but why should someone have to go to YouTube to watch Kyle Dunnigan's homemade show in order to get funny Joe Biden content? Biden would've been absolute comedy gold, even for those who voted for him, in a more sensible era.

The problem with post-liberal comedy and entertainment in the age of Trump "resistance" is that it's flattened everything into a form of intellect-free partisan cheerleading that's just not funny or entertaining. Colbert's show is absolutely indistinguishable from MSNBC content. Ratings for network late night or lavish awards shows are at historically and embarrassingly low levels, and most expensive mainstream entertainment is just becoming bland and unnecessary; and a failure of supply and especially demand.

It's important to remember that Carlin — old-school, "original formula" liberal progressive and civil libertarian — hated all politicians. Like really, really hated politicians. Partisans all want to claim him for themselves, but the truth is that he'd despise all of today's ultra-partisans, and I can't imagine he'd see anything he recognized in the "MSNBC mom and dads" or their children in the "Brooklynized forced-conformity phony left" crowds.

Comedy should be able to be just comedy again, not a series of committee-approved statements thinly disguised as jokes reinforcing one's hive-enhnaced belief system, but we seem to be moving further from that daily.

Expand full comment
Unset's avatar

Re the migrant article - really, you should be able to do better than this.

It is not "immoral" for Republicans to highlight the problem cleverly. It is immoral for the Biden administration to allow the problem to fester.

You are talking out of both sides of your mouth on illegal immigration like most Democratic politicians.

"Democrats of all ideological stripes should use this moment to celebrate the very places that could become permanent homes for migrants fleeing violence and economic calamity."

"An open border policy is not feasible."

If everyone fleeing poor economies has a valid asylum claim, then you have a de facto open border. You are too smart to not understand that, you just seem to be unwilling to admit it. The fact of the matter is, under the law economic distress is a not a valid basis to claim asylum.

"It was always a canard that low-wage immigrant workers undercut the employment of American citizens—they were, almost always, performing the sort of punishing work that most Americans would rather not do at all—but it is even less true now, in an economy where demand for service-sector work remains robust. Many employers are still struggling to fill job openings. This is especially true in New York, where restaurants can’t return to their pre-pandemic hours because of a lack of waitstaff and cooks."

Wow, I don't even see how you can call yourself a man of the left and repeat this Chamber of Commerce nonsense. Economics 101 says when "employers are still struggling to fill job openings" it is because the wages they are willing to pay are too low. Raise wages and the amount of work "most Americans would rather not do at all" drops dramatically. You do realize unpleasant work still gets done in countries with very little immigration such as Japan, don't you? OF COURSE importing a perpetual supply of easily exploitable serfs hurts American workers, and this is especially true of low-skill Americans with limited employment opportunities.

Expand full comment
5 more comments...

No posts