Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Laurence Bachmann's avatar

Great read. Not sure Rude Boy character types are actually ignored by publishing "gatekeepers". I think they're just really hard to write both critically and sympathetically. A delicate balance that would require exceptional skill to achieve.

The Rude Boy audience though is pandered to regularly. Jordon Peterson's fulminating rants on the diminishment of AWMs (abused white men) are a pot of gold. Admirals, captains and marine drill sergeants appear on every best seller list ordering men to "make your bed" "respect authority" but "be authoritative". Militarism remains a perfect expression of maleness for millions. And every rude boy's salvation.

I've always thought we don't see more Teddy Wayne character types because they're so tough to write. Wayne's characters are deeply disturbed--borderline and over the line sociopaths. It's reasonable their paranoia and misogyny be criticized even if they're occasionally right about women using men. Wayne has a masterful touch. Another is Salinger. Our now beloved Holden Caulfield was the antithesis of American can-do and industry: lazy, bored and disaffected. A schmuck who became the poster boy for 50s discontent. Alas, it isn't easy to be a JD or a Teddy.

Creepy and sympathetic simultaneously--infuriating but deserving. That's a heavy lift. But I think books, TV and film would all like, no love to find a new James Dean, more Teddy Waynes and a few rebels without causes. It's the editor/agent/talent scout's dream come true. Entertainment for men that isn't a comic book. Strange new world.

Look forward to checking out Incel.

Expand full comment
ARX-Han's avatar

Thank you for this wonderfully crafted review!

Am working on a longer response piece that expands into a general survey of the same issue in publishing.

Expand full comment
12 more comments...

No posts