Discussion about this post

User's avatar
John J’onzz's avatar

I'm not very familiar with the Drift, but I found n+1 to be mostly an intellectual ground zero for a generation of rich, privileged Brooklynites from Ivy League schools that gentrified that once-vibrant borough to insane smithereens and simultaneously created a "ideologically pure" political mindhive that ironically let themselves off the hook for offenses they were most guilty of, but loved ferociously, heinously calling everyone else out on. This group simultaneously near-destroyed all American subcultures and countercultures, and then moved on to infiltrate and destroy old-world cultural institutions throughout New York, and made a mockery of left spaces, who are now all totally run by smug yuppies from Brooklyn's laptop community. These are the people who think they're qualified to debate Adolph Reed on race and have become intrinsically anti-working class (and reactionary and puritan when you get down to it). They've made leftism and liberalism (and maybe even the idea of "culture") a dirty word for most working and middle class people. These are probably the worst people in recent US history. And I say that as someone who knows, and mostly likes on a human level, a lot of those people, and it makes me sad to see what they've devolved into on Twitter these last few years.

As far as the ignorant and continuing attacks against people who I'd actually consider on the actual left-liberal side of politics - but not going for some fake, dishonest purity - like Taibbi and Kirn, whose weekly podcast is full of truth, wisdom, warmth, humor, alongside a deep, profound literary knowledge - it's par for the course for rotten schmucks who invaded and destroyed New York's now-worst borough. They can't handle Taibbi and Kirn's honesty, and any criticism of - and especially bad news about - the new, post-liberal, post-left Democrats because it implicates them wholesale. I'd also argue that Anna Khachiyan has become one of New York's most important cultural commentators, because she sees through that empty cohort and knows how to deflate them thoroughly in a few sharp words, and she's turned archness into a high art form.

People should ask themselves why they're more mad about gentle, humorous and honest commentary from free-thinking liberal, literary types than actual conservatives? And what happened to open discourse and discussion and the exchange of ideas? Ten years ago Taibbi, Kirn and Khachiyan would have been NYC's intellectual heroes, and while they certainly are to the non-bodysnatched, Brooklyn wants to scare you away from even knowing what they say. (Even the Village Voice would be considered forbidden contraband now. We could certainly use a new Nat Hentoff, who'd also be considered dangerously "problematic" now.)

Expand full comment
Chris Jesu Lee's avatar

Kirn's Lost in the Meritocracy was one of my favourite reads of the past couple of years. The book really delves into the mindset of the modern-day literary/intellectual social climber that Kirn so refreshingly is honest about. To dismiss him as some kind of shallow political parrot because you disagree with his contemporary views is childish.

The first thing I ever wrote for my Substack a few months ago was partially about Kirn's book: https://salieriredemption.substack.com/p/the-dorky-social-climbers-of-the

Expand full comment
47 more comments...

No posts